Ad is loading...
FEAAX vs MAPTX
FEAAX vs MAPTX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs MAPTX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$44.17
Change-$1.00 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.26M
Matthews Pacific Tiger Investor
Price$16.28
Change-$0.10 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.65M
FEAAX vs MAPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEAAX vs. MAPTX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEAAX is a Hold and MAPTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAPTX has more cash in the bank: 694M vs. FEAAX (437M). MAPTX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: MAPTX (3.15) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than MAPTX: FEAAX (31 years) vs MAPTX (31 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MAPTX (1.12). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. MAPTX (14.78). FEAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPTX: FEAAX (0) vs MAPTX (2500). FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. MAPTX (-9.08). FEAAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.16 vs. MAPTX (-26.23).
| FEAAX | MAPTX | FEAAX / MAPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.12 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.12 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.421 | -7.353 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 694M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | -9.08 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.20 | -26.53 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.16 | -26.23 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.15 | -39.70 | -81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...