Ad is loading...
FEAAX vs MIPTX
FEAAX vs MIPTX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs MIPTX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$48.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$19.66
Change-$0.10 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FEAAX vs MIPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEAAX vs. MIPTX commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEAAX is a Buy and MIPTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIPTX has more cash in the bank: 981M vs. FEAAX (437M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: MIPTX (3.14) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than MIPTX: FEAAX (31 years) vs MIPTX (14 years). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. MIPTX (14.78). FEAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: FEAAX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.15 vs. MIPTX (8.68). FEAAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.10 vs. MIPTX (-28.21).
| FEAAX | MIPTX | FEAAX / MIPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.529 | 5.642 | 435% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 981M | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.15 | 8.68 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.31 | -25.52 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.10 | -28.21 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.89 | -18.63 | -338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers