Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEATX vs TRZNX
FEATX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FEATX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia M
Price$51.79
Change+$0.13 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.97M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$18.38
Change+$0.14 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
FEATX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. FEATX (454M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FEATX: TRZNX (2.19) vs FEATX (0.00). FEATX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FEATX (26 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). FEATX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). FEATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FEATX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FEATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.24 vs. TRZNX (10.62).
| FEATX | TRZNX | FEATX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.83 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.012 | 10.278 | 156% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 1.89B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.24 | 10.62 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.12 | 11.92 | 353% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement