Ad is loading...
FEMKX vs RNWHX
FEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWHX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Price$39.75
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$79.43
Change-$0.43 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.63B
FEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Buy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. FEMKX (7.45B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWHX (1.44) vs FEMKX (1.05). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEMKX (34 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FEMKX (23.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. RNWHX (4.96). FEMKX (17.72) and RNWHX (17.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FEMKX | RNWHX | FEMKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.385 | 4.486 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.45B | 63.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.44 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | 4.96 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.54 | 6.00 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.72 | 17.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.73 | N/A | - |