Ad is loading...
FEMKX vs RNWHX
FEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWHX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Price$35.86
Change+$2.17 (+6.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.94B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$73.35
Change+$3.82 (+5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.16B
FEMKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 56.2B vs. FEMKX (6.94B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWHX (1.12) vs FEMKX (0.66). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEMKX (34 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). RNWHX (-10.49) and FEMKX (-10.60) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 25.70 vs. FEMKX (18.12).
| FEMKX | RNWHX | FEMKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.72 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.72 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.528 | -8.537 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.94B | 56.2B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.12 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.60 | -10.49 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.51 | -4.76 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.12 | 25.70 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...