Ad is loading...
FETM
Price
$44.99
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
FUNC
Price
$34.62
Change
+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FETM vs FUNC

Header iconFETM vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FETM vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Fentura Financial
Price$44.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$725
CapitalizationN/A
First United
Price$34.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Volume$21.86K
CapitalizationN/A
FETM vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FETM vs. FUNC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FETM is a Hold and FUNC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FETM: $44.99 vs. FUNC: $34.62)
Brand notoriety: FETM and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FETM: 13% vs. FUNC: 119%
Market capitalization -- FETM: $92.37M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
FETM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $92.37M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FETM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FETM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than FETM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FETM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

FETM is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2023.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than FETM($92.4M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than FETM: FUNC (10.14) vs FETM (5.83). FETM YTD gains are higher at: 67.885 vs. FUNC (52.257). FETM has more cash in the bank: 100M vs. FUNC (86.9M). FUNC has less debt than FETM: FUNC (112M) vs FETM (259M). FUNC has higher revenues than FETM: FUNC (71.3M) vs FETM (61.3M).
FETMFUNCFETM / FUNC
Capitalization92.4M152M61%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD67.88552.257130%
P/E Ratio5.8310.1457%
Revenue61.3M71.3M86%
Total Cash100M86.9M115%
Total Debt259M112M231%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FETM vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FETM
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5021
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1324
SMR RATING
1..100
4945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FETM (75) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FETM’s over the last 12 months.

FETM's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (24) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FETM (49) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FETM’s over the last 12 months.

FETM's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FETM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PVCCX12.86N/A
N/A
Pioneer Intrinsic Value C
FEFRX29.32-0.24
-0.81%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund R6
AFEGX57.05-0.84
-1.45%
American Century Sustainable Equity G
TSCPX12.91-0.22
-1.68%
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
DBMCX21.43-0.55
-2.50%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C

FETM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FETM has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FETM jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FETM
1D Price
Change %
FETM100%
-0.02%
FUNC - FETM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
FBNC - FETM
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
HBNC - FETM
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
EFSC - FETM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
PNFP - FETM
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More