Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LSGRX
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$83.73
Change+$0.73 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$32.39
Change+$0.45 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.48B
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. LSGRX (17.5B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: FFAFX (0.57) vs LSGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LSGRX (34 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: FFAFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.87 vs. FFAFX (21.13).
| FFAFX | LSGRX | FFAFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.66 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.844 | 9.574 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 17.5B | 1,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.13 | 27.87 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.79 | 53.80 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 50.09 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 187.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement