Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LSGRX
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$78.37
Change+$0.76 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$30.30
Change+$0.45 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.09B
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. LSGRX (16.1B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: FFAFX (0.62) vs LSGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LSGRX (34 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: FFAFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. FFAFX (9.65).
| FFAFX | LSGRX | FFAFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.66 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.620 | 0.981 | 573% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 16.1B | 1,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 11.97 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.20 | 46.11 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 48.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 175.46 | - |