Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs LSGRX
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$68.64
Change+$6.53 (+10.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$26.53
Change+$2.71 (+11.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.53B
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. LSGRX (12.5B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: FFAFX (0.68) vs LSGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: FFAFX (4 years) vs LSGRX (34 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: FFAFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.10 vs. FFAFX (-11.84).
| FFAFX | LSGRX | FFAFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.66 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.294 | -19.418 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246B | 12.5B | 1,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.84 | -8.10 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.95 | 1.88 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 38.97 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 119.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...