Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs MBCSX
FFAFX vs MBCSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MBCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$62.11
Change-$0.89 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R5
Price$18.87
Change-$0.30 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
FFAFX vs MBCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. MBCSX (1.77B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than MBCSX: FFAFX (0.68) vs MBCSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MBCSX: FFAFX (4 years) vs MBCSX (24 years). MBCSX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MBCSX (11.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCSX: FFAFX (250) vs MBCSX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.82 vs. MBCSX (-13.92).
| FFAFX | MBCSX | FFAFX / MBCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.75 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.75 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.294 | -17.831 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246B | 1.77B | 13,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.82 | -13.92 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.95 | -22.69 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -11.52 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.82 | - |