Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHOX
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$78.75
Change+$0.76 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.77B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.37
Change+$0.16 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38M
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MSHOX (5.38M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHOX (1.18) vs FFAFX (0.62). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). MSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. FFAFX (6.92).
| FFAFX | MSHOX | FFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 13.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.108 | 16.380 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 5.38M | 5,686,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.18 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 11.18 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.64 | 30.79 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 15.97 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement