Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs MSHOX
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$72.47
Change+$0.54 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$12.62
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74M
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. MSHOX (4.74M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHOX (1.28) vs FFAFX (0.67). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (14.88) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.94 vs. MSHOX (-0.11).
| FFAFX | MSHOX | FFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 14.88 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.332 | 2.785 | -84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 4.74M | 5,990,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.28 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.94 | -0.11 | -3,611% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.81 | 20.44 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 10.03 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...