Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs MSHPX
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$66.69
Change-$3.97 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$12.65
Change-$0.65 (-4.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77M
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. MSHPX (4.77M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHPX (2.58) vs FFAFX (0.68). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: FFAFX (4 years) vs MSHPX (5 years). MSHPX (11.18) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.48 vs. MSHPX (-3.85).
| FFAFX | MSHPX | FFAFX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 11.18 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.771 | 3.906 | -122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 4.77M | 5,865,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 2.58 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | -3.85 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | 3.91 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 43.28 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...