Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs MSHPX
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$70.17
Change+$0.84 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.5B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$13.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.67M
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 277B vs. MSHPX (4.67M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHPX (2.58) vs FFAFX (0.68). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: FFAFX (4 years) vs MSHPX (5 years). MSHPX (11.18) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.70 vs. MSHPX (-0.62).
| FFAFX | MSHPX | FFAFX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 11.18 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.431 | 1.719 | -316% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277B | 4.67M | 5,928,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 2.58 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | -0.62 | -599% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 14.31 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 22.11 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers