Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWAUX
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWAUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$83.04
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.6B
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A
Price$14.46
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.64M
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NWAUX (276M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: NWAUX (0.97) vs FFAFX (0.58). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWAUX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWAUX (4 years). NWAUX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 217.11 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: FFAFX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. NWAUX (-16.30).
| FFAFX | NWAUX | FFAFX / NWAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.11 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.914 | -4.148 | -287% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 276M | 117,029% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.70 | -16.30 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.93 | 27.67 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement