Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs NWZMX
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZMX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$69.33
Change+$1.72 (+2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$17.34
Change+$0.49 (+2.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.47M
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. NWZMX (163M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: FFAFX (0.68) vs NWZMX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: FFAFX (4 years) vs NWZMX (8 years). NWZMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.82 vs. NWZMX (1.63).
| FFAFX | NWZMX | FFAFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.82 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.563 | -12.558 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 163M | 163,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.82 | 1.63 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.77 | 17.67 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 33.73 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |