Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWZMX
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZMX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$75.72
Change+$0.28 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.16B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$19.37
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45M
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 297B vs. NWZMX (192M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: FFAFX (0.67) vs NWZMX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWZMX (8 years). NWZMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). NWZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. FFAFX (5.76).
| FFAFX | NWZMX | FFAFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.82 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.671 | 1.557 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297B | 192M | 154,688% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 12.15 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.60 | 56.19 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 46.81 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement