Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs PGWCX
FFAFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs PGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$62.83
Change-$3.86 (-5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.01B
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$26.32
Change-$1.66 (-5.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
FFAFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. PGWCX (1.28B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: FFAFX (0.68) vs PGWCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: FFAFX (4 years) vs PGWCX (41 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: FFAFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.48 vs. PGWCX (-2.78).
| FFAFX | PGWCX | FFAFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.771 | -8.305 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264B | 1.28B | 20,561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | -2.78 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | -0.87 | -749% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.75 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...