Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs PGWCX
FFAFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs PGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$69.33
Change+$1.72 (+2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$29.40
Change+$0.85 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FFAFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. PGWCX (1.29B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: FFAFX (0.68) vs PGWCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: FFAFX (4 years) vs PGWCX (41 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: FFAFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.82 vs. PGWCX (-2.86).
| FFAFX | PGWCX | FFAFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.563 | -11.856 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 1.29B | 20,698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.82 | -2.86 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.77 | 6.57 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -4.13 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -9.82 | - |