Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs RGWCX
FFAFX vs RGWCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$66.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
FFAFX vs RGWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. RGWCX (285M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RGWCX: FFAFX (0.68) vs RGWCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RGWCX: FFAFX (4 years) vs RGWCX (18 years). RGWCX (3.33) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RGWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGWCX: FFAFX (250) vs RGWCX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.60 vs. RGWCX (-6.30).
| FFAFX | RGWCX | FFAFX / RGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.93 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 3.33 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.011 | -15.548 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 285M | 91,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | -6.30 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.49 | 11.02 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 28.18 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.24 | - |