Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs RSGRX
FFAFX vs RSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$66.69
Change-$3.97 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
FFAFX vs RSGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. RSGRX (310M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RSGRX: FFAFX (0.68) vs RSGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RSGRX: FFAFX (4 years) vs RSGRX (33 years). RSGRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGRX: FFAFX (250) vs RSGRX (2500). RSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. FFAFX (0.48).
| FFAFX | RSGRX | FFAFX / RSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.10 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.18 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.771 | -9.138 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 310M | 90,323% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 0.86 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | 16.78 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 82.48 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers