Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WSACX
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$83.49
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$29.47
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.7M
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. WSACX (61.7M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: FFAFX (0.58) vs WSACX (0.06). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WSACX (30 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: FFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. WSACX (7.44).
| FFAFX | WSACX | FFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.520 | 5.474 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 61.7M | 525,122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.06 | 919% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 7.44 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.27 | 26.85 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 28.27 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement