Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WSACX
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$80.93
Change+$0.84 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$29.00
Change+$0.24 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.71M
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. WSACX (60.7M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: FFAFX (0.62) vs WSACX (0.07). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WSACX (30 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: FFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. WSACX (7.14).
| FFAFX | WSACX | FFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.070 | 3.565 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314B | 60.7M | 517,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.07 | 930% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 7.14 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.78 | 20.58 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 35.26 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.76 | - |