Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs WSACX
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$65.99
Change-$1.40 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.59B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$24.87
Change-$0.49 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.06M
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. WSACX (54.1M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: FFAFX (0.68) vs WSACX (0.07). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: FFAFX (4 years) vs WSACX (30 years). WSACX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: FFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.22 vs. FFAFX (-3.33).
| FFAFX | WSACX | FFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.38 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.38 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.065 | -8.678 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 54.1M | 493,530% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.07 | 951% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.33 | 0.22 | -1,496% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.23 | -6.71 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 27.20 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...