Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs WSACX
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$72.47
Change+$0.54 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$26.64
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.47M
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. WSACX (56.5M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: FFAFX (0.67) vs WSACX (0.07). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WSACX (30 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: FFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.94 vs. WSACX (2.38).
| FFAFX | WSACX | FFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.332 | -4.537 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 56.5M | 502,655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.07 | 944% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.94 | 2.38 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.81 | 8.58 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 27.83 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.78 | - |