Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FFAMX (10.8B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (1.84) vs RLBAX (1.13). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.85). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. FFAMX (9.77). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.85 vs. FFAMX (17.18).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.32 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.182 | 9.555 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 283B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.13 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 11.72 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.04 | 41.70 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.18 | 29.85 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.95 | 73.93 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers