FFAMX vs RLBCX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBCX
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFAMX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 26, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. FFAMX (9.42B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FFAMX (2.23) vs RLBCX (1.28). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FFAMX (17 years) vs RLBCX (21 years). FFAMX (0.91) and RLBCX (0.90) have similar cost to investors .FFAMX (0.91) and RLBCX (0.90) is less costly to investors than . RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FFAMX (20.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. FFAMX (3.54). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.90 vs. FFAMX (4.70).
| FFAMX | RLBCX | FFAMX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.90 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.90 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.231 | 4.194 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.42B | 196B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 1.28 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 10.29 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.49 | 7.25 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.70 | 11.90 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.08 | 39.16 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interesting Tickers