Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBCX
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$21.73
Change+$0.10 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.63B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.61
Change+$0.21 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.83B
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. FFAMX (9.63B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FFAMX (2.00) vs RLBCX (1.57). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FFAMX (7.20) and RLBCX (7.16) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.33 vs. FFAMX (24.73).
| FFAMX | RLBCX | FFAMX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.89 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.89 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.666 | 7.829 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.63B | 251B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.57 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 7.16 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.06 | 33.71 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.73 | 38.33 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.28 | 61.55 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement