FFBC
Price
$24.26
Change
-$0.39 (-1.58%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
36 days until earnings call
FULT
Price
$17.22
Change
-$0.23 (-1.32%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.57B
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFBC vs FULT

Header iconFFBC vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs FULTBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$24.26
Change-$0.39 (-1.58%)
Volume$6.17K
Capitalization2.08B
Fulton Financial
Price$17.22
Change-$0.23 (-1.32%)
Volume$39.58K
Capitalization2.57B
FFBC vs FULT Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. FULT commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a StrongBuy and FULT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $24.67 vs. FULT: $17.46)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 119% vs. FULT: 120%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.08B vs. FULT: $2.57B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than FULT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -9.12% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -11.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.57B) has a higher market cap than FFBC($2.08B). FULT has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: FULT (9.54) vs FFBC (8.15). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: -7.430 vs. FULT (-9.440). FULT has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. FFBC (213M). FFBC has less debt than FULT: FFBC (1.28B) vs FULT (1.64B). FULT has higher revenues than FFBC: FULT (1.08B) vs FFBC (840M).
FFBCFULTFFBC / FULT
Capitalization2.08B2.57B81%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.430-9.44079%
P/E Ratio8.159.5485%
Revenue840M1.08B78%
Total Cash213M304M70%
Total Debt1.28B1.64B78%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5557
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5755
SMR RATING
1..100
1211
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9696
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (51). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (57). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (12). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (96) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (96). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (29). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JVTNX81.51N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Venture N
DAEIX21.63N/A
N/A
Dean Equity Income
GSISX29.84N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG Svc
TCEPX40.06N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Index Premier
JERTX11.59N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate T

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-3.08%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
NWBI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
UCB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-4.26%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-5.73%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-5.11%
ABCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-3.27%
ASB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-5.26%
FFBC - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
-3.08%
HWC - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
-4.62%
NWBI - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
More