FFBC
Price
$23.39
Change
-$1.71 (-6.81%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
14 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$26.21
Change
-$1.51 (-5.45%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
629.13M
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFBC vs MCBS

Header iconFFBC vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs MCBSBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$23.39
Change-$1.71 (-6.81%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.08B
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$26.21
Change-$1.51 (-5.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization629.13M
FFBC vs MCBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. MCBS commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and MCBS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $25.10 vs. MCBS: $27.72)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 109% vs. MCBS: 134%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.08B vs. MCBS: $629.13M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.87% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than MCBS($629M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: MCBS (11.86) vs FFBC (8.15). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: -5.797 vs. MCBS (-12.603). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. FFBC (213M). MCBS has less debt than FFBC: MCBS (334M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than MCBS: FFBC (840M) vs MCBS (118M).
FFBCMCBSFFBC / MCBS
Capitalization2.08B629M331%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.797-12.60346%
P/E Ratio8.1511.8669%
Revenue840M118M712%
Total Cash213M251M85%
Total Debt1.28B334M384%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2127
SMR RATING
1..100
1225
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2152
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (90) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (27) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (25) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (59) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (52) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCSAX108.31N/A
N/A
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Admiral
FACEX13.60N/A
N/A
Frost Growth Equity Investor
ALBAX74.64N/A
N/A
Alger Growth & Income A
AMINX62.43N/A
N/A
Amana Income Institutional
NRFNX10.88N/A
N/A
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+1.13%
NWBI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
UCB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
+0.36%
CTBI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
BFC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
UBSI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
FFBC - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FCBC - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
More