FFBC
Price
$23.46
Change
-$0.42 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
42 days until earnings call
NIC
Price
$116.77
Change
-$3.47 (-2.89%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs NIC

Header iconFFBC vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs NICBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$23.46
Change-$0.42 (-1.76%)
Volume$246.03K
Capitalization2.08B
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$116.77
Change-$3.47 (-2.89%)
Volume$48.36K
Capitalization1.25B
FFBC vs NIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. NIC commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and NIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $23.46 vs. NIC: $116.77)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 59% vs. NIC: 76%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.08B vs. NIC: $1.25B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.32% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

NIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than NIC($1.25B). NIC has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: NIC (20.55) vs FFBC (8.15). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 11.866 vs. FFBC (-11.069). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 213M vs. NIC (130M). NIC has less debt than FFBC: NIC (167M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than NIC: FFBC (840M) vs NIC (278M).
FFBCNICFFBC / NIC
Capitalization2.08B1.25B167%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.06911.866-93%
P/E Ratio8.1520.5540%
Revenue840M278M302%
Total Cash213M130M164%
Total Debt1.28B167M768%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5460
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2625
SMR RATING
1..100
910
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3531
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (86). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (26). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (10). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (59). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (35). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCIUX17.570.19
+1.09%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl I
RGLBX25.330.08
+0.32%
American Funds Global Insight R-2
PAGHX104.95N/A
N/A
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth C
FMCLX15.05N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Mid-Cap Index R6
PCMSX15.58N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap Value I R6