FFBC vs NIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and NIC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
NIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FFBC | NIC | FFBC / NIC | |
| Capitalization | 2.08B | 1.25B | 167% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.078 | 40.390 | 62% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.15 | 20.55 | 40% |
| Revenue | 840M | 278M | 302% |
| Total Cash | 213M | 130M | 164% |
| Total Debt | 1.28B | 167M | 768% |
FFBC | NIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFBC's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (85). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (40). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.
FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (17). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (42). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.
FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (84). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.
| FFBC | NIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 29 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 52% |
FFBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFBC | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| UBSI - FFBC | 92% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| BUSE - FFBC | 91% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| FRME - FFBC | 91% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| UCB - FFBC | 91% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| NWBI - FFBC | 91% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||