Ad is loading...
FFBFX vs FRBCX
FFBFX vs FRBCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FRBCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$24.51
Change-$0.87 (-3.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.36M
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$24.59
Change-$0.96 (-3.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets817.39M
FFBFX vs FRBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FRBCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FRBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 817M vs. FFBFX (47.4M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FRBCX: FFBFX (2.06) vs FRBCX (1.14). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FRBCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FRBCX (26 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FFBFX (1.82). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FRBCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.25 vs. FRBCX (12.93). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.94 vs. FFBFX (17.43).
| FFBFX | FRBCX | FFBFX / FRBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.96 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.97 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.973 | -4.415 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 817M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.14 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.25 | 12.93 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.41 | -12.37 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.43 | 55.94 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.76 | 50.91 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...