Ad is loading...
FFBQX vs RDLTX
FFBQX vs RDLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBQX vs. RDLTX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBQX is a Hold and RDLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FFBQX (335M). FFBQX pays higher dividends than RDLTX: FFBQX (1.72) vs RDLTX (0.84). FFBQX was incepted earlier than RDLTX: FFBQX (6 years) vs RDLTX (5 years). RDLTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFBQX (0.30). FFBQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RDLTX (4.00). FFBQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLTX: FFBQX (0) vs RDLTX (250). RDLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.75 vs. FFBQX (8.67). RDLTX return over 5 years is better than : 68.53 vs. FFBQX (65.10).
| FFBQX | RDLTX | FFBQX / RDLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.74 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.74 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.947 | 3.736 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335M | 4.43B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.84 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | 9.75 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.94 | 33.74 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.10 | 68.53 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...