Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBSX vs RHLTX
FFBSX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBSX vs. RHLTX commentary
May 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBSX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FFBSX (335M). FFBSX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FFBSX (1.58) vs RHLTX (1.01). FFBSX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFBSX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFBSX (0.50). FFBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFBSX (0) vs RHLTX (250). RHLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. FFBSX (8.20). RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 64.36 vs. FFBSX (58.73).
| FFBSX | RHLTX | FFBSX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.53 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.53 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.176 | 3.381 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335M | 4.43B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.01 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 8.76 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.61 | 35.20 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.73 | 64.36 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement