Ad is loading...
FFBSX vs RHLTX
FFBSX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBSX vs. RHLTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBSX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FFBSX (322M). FFBSX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FFBSX (1.58) vs RHLTX (1.02). FFBSX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFBSX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFBSX (0.50). FFBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFBSX (0) vs RHLTX (250). FFBSX (6.51) and RHLTX (6.48) have marching annual gain over last year. RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 60.20 vs. FFBSX (54.02).
| FFBSX | RHLTX | FFBSX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.53 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.53 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -1.261 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 4.23B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.02 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 6.48 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.92 | 24.68 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | 60.20 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |