FFBW
Price
$14.01
Change
-$0.08 (-0.57%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
59.82M
PWOD
Price
$29.59
Change
+$0.50 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
145.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBW vs PWOD

Header iconFFBW vs PWOD Comparison
Open Charts FFBW vs PWODBanner chart's image
FFBW
Price$14.01
Change-$0.08 (-0.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization59.82M
Penns Woods Ban
Price$29.59
Change+$0.50 (+1.72%)
Volume$339
Capitalization145.84M
FFBW vs PWOD Comparison Chart
Loading...
PWOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBW vs. PWOD commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBW is a StrongBuy and PWOD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBW: $14.01 vs. PWOD: $29.09)
Brand notoriety: FFBW and PWOD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBW: 2% vs. PWOD: 85%
Market capitalization -- FFBW: $59.82M vs. PWOD: $145.84M
FFBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $59.82M. PWOD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $145.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWOD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWOD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWOD is a better buy in the long-term than FFBW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWOD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PWOD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FFBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while PWOD (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBW is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

PWOD is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWOD($146M) has a higher market cap than FFBW($59.8M). FFBW has higher P/E ratio than PWOD: FFBW (25.91) vs PWOD (8.03). FFBW YTD gains are higher at: -1.598 vs. PWOD (-3.180). FFBW has less debt than PWOD: FFBW (20M) vs PWOD (397M). PWOD has higher revenues than FFBW: PWOD (63.3M) vs FFBW (12.8M).
FFBWPWODFFBW / PWOD
Capitalization59.8M146M41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.598-3.18050%
P/E Ratio25.918.03322%
Revenue12.8M63.3M20%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20M397M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBW vs PWOD: Fundamental Ratings
FFBW
PWOD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3818
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1731
SMR RATING
1..100
6017
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4134
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PWOD's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBW (80) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PWOD’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PWOD (31) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to PWOD’s over the last 12 months.

PWOD's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBW (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PWOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PWOD (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to PWOD’s over the last 12 months.

PWOD's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBW (41) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PWOD’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWOD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGRE26.760.13
+0.49%
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Qual Div Gr ETF
APRJ24.74-0.03
-0.12%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Apr
BST37.20-0.05
-0.13%
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
HAPI36.63-0.11
-0.29%
Harbor Human Capital Factor US LrgCapETF
IVV595.98-2.79
-0.47%
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

FFBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBW has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFBW jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBW
1D Price
Change %
FFBW100%
-0.55%
GSBX - FFBW
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PWOD - FFBW
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
RVSB - FFBW
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
OVBC - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CNBB - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More