Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFEDX vs RBDTX
FFEDX vs RBDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFEDX vs. RBDTX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFEDX is a Hold and RBDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. FFEDX (14.2B). FFEDX pays higher dividends than RBDTX: FFEDX (2.62) vs RBDTX (1.72). FFEDX was incepted earlier than RBDTX: FFEDX (10 years) vs RBDTX (18 years). RBDTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FFEDX (0.08). FFEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RBDTX (10.00). RBDTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFEDX: RBDTX (250) vs FFEDX (5000000). FFEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. RBDTX (6.50). FFEDX return over 5 years is better than : 30.91 vs. RBDTX (17.89).
| FFEDX | RBDTX | FFEDX / RBDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.40 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.40 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.351 | 5.495 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 32.5B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 1.72 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 6.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.60 | 21.81 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.91 | 17.89 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement