Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFCX vs MMFGX
FFFCX vs MMFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFCX vs. MMFGX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFCX is a Hold and MMFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFCX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. MMFGX (4.58M). FFFCX pays higher dividends than MMFGX: FFFCX (2.96) vs MMFGX (1.85). FFFCX was incepted earlier than MMFGX: FFFCX (29 years) vs MMFGX (7 years). MMFGX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFFCX (0.48). MMFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FFFCX (13.00). FFFCX (0) and MMFGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. FFFCX (6.03). FFFCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.41 vs. MMFGX (2.98).
| FFFCX | MMFGX | FFFCX / MMFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.99 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.18 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.240 | 3.159 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 4.58M | 68,029% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 1.85 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 6.98 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.65 | 12.24 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.41 | 2.98 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.98 | N/A | - |