Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFDX vs TCWHX
FFFDX vs TCWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFDX vs. TCWHX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFDX is a Hold and TCWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFDX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. TCWHX (2.1B). TCWHX pays higher dividends than FFFDX: TCWHX (3.32) vs FFFDX (2.42). FFFDX was incepted earlier than TCWHX: FFFDX (29 years) vs TCWHX (10 years). TCWHX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FFFDX (0.55). FFFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. TCWHX (12.00). FFFDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCWHX: FFFDX (0) vs TCWHX (100000). TCWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.36 vs. FFFDX (4.67). TCWHX return over 5 years is better than : 12.19 vs. FFFDX (6.98).
| FFFDX | TCWHX | FFFDX / TCWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.48 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.62 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.453 | 5.851 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 2.1B | 615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 3.32 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.67 | 5.36 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 20.61 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.98 | 12.19 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers