Ad is loading...
FFFFX vs RHGTX
FFFFX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFFX vs. RHGTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFFX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. FFFFX (27.5B). RHGTX pays higher dividends than FFFFX: RHGTX (1.47) vs FFFFX (1.39). FFFFX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FFFFX (25 years) vs RHGTX (9 years). FFFFX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RHGTX (0.50). FFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). FFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: FFFFX (0) vs RHGTX (250). FFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. RHGTX (7.12). RHGTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.12 vs. FFFFX (38.91).
| FFFFX | RHGTX | FFFFX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.50 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.50 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.173 | -0.836 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.5B | 43.6B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.47 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.71 | 7.12 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.21 | 17.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.91 | 46.12 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...