Ad is loading...
FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMLX
Emerald Growth Investor
Price$18.90
Change+$0.36 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.29M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.78
Change+$0.16 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.46M
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 744M vs. WCMLX (38.5M). FFGRX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FFGRX (2.69) vs WCMLX (0.00). FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FFGRX (14 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.17). FFGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). FFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FFGRX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.03 vs. FFGRX (-18.06). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.50 vs. FFGRX (-9.60).
| FFGRX | WCMLX | FFGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.86 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.810 | -17.418 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 744M | 38.5M | 1,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.06 | -17.03 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.69 | -9.46 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.60 | 24.50 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers