Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMLX
Emerald Growth Investor
Price$25.23
Change+$0.43 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.99M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.92
Change+$0.22 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.81M
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 960M vs. WCMLX (42.8M). FFGRX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FFGRX (2.29) vs WCMLX (0.00). FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FFGRX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.17). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FFGRX (45.00). FFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FFGRX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). FFGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. WCMLX (-3.35). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 19.36 vs. FFGRX (-6.62).
| FFGRX | WCMLX | FFGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.79 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.266 | -1.244 | -584% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 960M | 42.8M | 2,243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -3.35 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.75 | 23.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.62 | 19.36 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement