Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMLX
Emerald Growth Investor
Price$23.10
Change+$0.30 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets900.86M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.31
Change+$0.13 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 901M vs. WCMLX (43M). FFGRX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FFGRX (2.50) vs WCMLX (0.00). FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FFGRX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.17). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FFGRX (51.00). FFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FFGRX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.22 vs. FFGRX (-2.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.83 vs. FFGRX (-12.38).
| FFGRX | WCMLX | FFGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.79 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.384 | -5.288 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 901M | 43M | 2,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | -1.22 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.29 | 10.63 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.38 | 13.83 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement