Ad is loading...
FFGRX vs WCMLX
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMLX
Emerald Growth Investor
Price$21.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets848.42M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.98M
FFGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 848M vs. WCMLX (42M). FFGRX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FFGRX (2.71) vs WCMLX (0.00). FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FFGRX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.17). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FFGRX (51.00). FFGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FFGRX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.97 vs. FFGRX (-8.53). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.04 vs. FFGRX (-10.60).
| FFGRX | WCMLX | FFGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.86 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.434 | -8.709 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 848M | 42M | 2,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.53 | -6.97 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.25 | 14.99 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.60 | 22.04 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers