Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGRX vs WCMNX
FFGRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMNX
Emerald Growth Investor
Price$25.23
Change+$0.43 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.99M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.74
Change+$0.23 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.81M
FFGRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 960M vs. WCMNX (42.8M). FFGRX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: FFGRX (2.29) vs WCMNX (0.00). FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FFGRX (14 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.17). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FFGRX (45.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFGRX: WCMNX (1000) vs FFGRX (2000). FFGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. WCMNX (-6.27). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.76 vs. FFGRX (-6.62).
| FFGRX | WCMNX | FFGRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 2.04 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.266 | -2.285 | -318% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 960M | 42.8M | 2,243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -6.27 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.75 | 20.39 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.62 | 16.76 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement