Ad is loading...
FFGRX vs WCMNX
FFGRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FFGRX vs WCMNX
Emerald Growth Investor
Price$18.90
Change+$0.36 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.29M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.63
Change+$0.15 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.46M
FFGRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGRX is a Hold and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGRX has more cash in the bank: 744M vs. WCMNX (38.5M). FFGRX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: FFGRX (2.69) vs WCMNX (0.00). FFGRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FFGRX (14 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FFGRX (1.17). FFGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFGRX: WCMNX (1000) vs FFGRX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.15 vs. FFGRX (-18.06). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.00 vs. FFGRX (-9.60).
| FFGRX | WCMNX | FFGRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 2.11 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.810 | -17.415 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 744M | 38.5M | 1,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.06 | -17.15 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.69 | -10.12 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.60 | 23.00 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers