Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs ICBAX
FFGTX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.87
Change+$0.22 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.72M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$17.80
Change+$0.23 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.48M
FFGTX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. ICBAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 882M vs. ICBAX (131M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FFGTX (1.41) vs ICBAX (0.65). FFGTX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FFGTX (16 years) vs ICBAX (14 years). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. FFGTX (113.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FFGTX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. ICBAX (9.10). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 73.10 vs. ICBAX (48.68).
| FFGTX | ICBAX | FFGTX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.900 | 4.149 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 131M | 673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.65 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.94 | 9.10 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.54 | 5.66 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.10 | 48.68 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.26 | 32.62 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers