Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs RYBCX
FFGTX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.13
Change+$0.07 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets834.61M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$54.49
Change+$0.19 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.67M
FFGTX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. RYBCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and RYBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 835M vs. RYBCX (22.7M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FFGTX (1.94) vs RYBCX (0.06). FFGTX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs RYBCX (24 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and RYBCX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FFGTX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.95 vs. RYBCX (-16.19). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 97.26 vs. RYBCX (42.07).
| FFGTX | RYBCX | FFGTX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.40 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.43 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.613 | 3.967 | 15% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 22.7M | 3,678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.06 | 3,149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.95 | -16.19 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.24 | -13.62 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.26 | 42.07 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.54 | 31.18 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...