Ad is loading...
FFLDX vs NSFLX
FFLDX vs NSFLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLDX vs. NSFLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLDX is a Hold and NSFLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLDX has more cash in the bank: 15.3B vs. NSFLX (22.8M). FFLDX pays higher dividends than NSFLX: FFLDX (2.00) vs NSFLX (1.41). FFLDX was incepted earlier than NSFLX: FFLDX (10 years) vs NSFLX (8 years). NSFLX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FFLDX (0.08). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FFLDX (8.00). NSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLDX: NSFLX (1000000) vs FFLDX (5000000). FFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. NSFLX (1.39). FFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 69.25 vs. NSFLX (32.44).
| FFLDX | NSFLX | FFLDX / NSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.55 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.638 | -2.221 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.3B | 22.8M | 67,105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.41 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | 1.39 | 681% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 26.56 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.25 | 32.44 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...