Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLDX vs NSFLX
FFLDX vs NSFLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLDX vs. NSFLX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLDX is a Hold and NSFLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLDX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. NSFLX (20M). FFLDX pays higher dividends than NSFLX: FFLDX (1.92) vs NSFLX (1.34). FFLDX was incepted earlier than NSFLX: FFLDX (10 years) vs NSFLX (8 years). NSFLX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FFLDX (0.08). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FFLDX (8.00). NSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLDX: NSFLX (1000000) vs FFLDX (5000000). FFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.20 vs. NSFLX (6.58). FFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.82 vs. NSFLX (33.06).
| FFLDX | NSFLX | FFLDX / NSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.55 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.978 | 4.038 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.2B | 20M | 81,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.34 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.20 | 6.58 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.91 | 40.68 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.82 | 33.06 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers