Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLDX vs NSFLX
FFLDX vs NSFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLDX vs. NSFLX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLDX is a Hold and NSFLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLDX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. NSFLX (13.5M). FFLDX pays higher dividends than NSFLX: FFLDX (1.84) vs NSFLX (1.29). FFLDX was incepted earlier than NSFLX: FFLDX (10 years) vs NSFLX (8 years). NSFLX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FFLDX (0.08). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FFLDX (12.00). NSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLDX: NSFLX (1000000) vs FFLDX (5000000). FFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.74 vs. NSFLX (7.56). FFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.76 vs. NSFLX (32.71).
| FFLDX | NSFLX | FFLDX / NSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.49 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.43 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.974 | 6.257 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 13.5M | 126,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.29 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.74 | 7.56 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.46 | 40.75 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.76 | 32.71 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement