Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLEX vs RHKTX
FFLEX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLEX vs. RHKTX commentary
May 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLEX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. FFLEX (8.82B). FFLEX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FFLEX (1.97) vs RHKTX (1.05). FFLEX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FFLEX (10 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFLEX (0.08). FFLEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). RHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLEX: RHKTX (250) vs FFLEX (5000000). FFLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. RHKTX (8.32). FFLEX return over 5 years is better than : 72.52 vs. RHKTX (51.07).
| FFLEX | RHKTX | FFLEX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.53 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.53 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.264 | 3.427 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.82B | 15.9B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.05 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.98 | 8.32 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.16 | 30.03 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.52 | 51.07 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers