Ad is loading...
FFLEX vs RHKTX
FFLEX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLEX vs. RHKTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLEX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FFLEX (8.65B). FFLEX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FFLEX (1.99) vs RHKTX (1.06). FFLEX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FFLEX (10 years) vs RHKTX (9 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFLEX (0.08). FFLEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). RHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLEX: RHKTX (250) vs FFLEX (5000000). FFLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.39 vs. RHKTX (6.03). FFLEX return over 5 years is better than : 67.05 vs. RHKTX (47.18).
| FFLEX | RHKTX | FFLEX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.53 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.53 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.055 | -1.236 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.65B | 15B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.06 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 6.03 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.08 | 19.95 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.05 | 47.18 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...