Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLEX vs RHKTX
FFLEX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLEX vs. RHKTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLEX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. FFLEX (9.41B). FFLEX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FFLEX (1.90) vs RHKTX (0.99). FFLEX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FFLEX (10 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFLEX (0.08). FFLEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). RHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLEX: RHKTX (250) vs FFLEX (5000000). FFLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. RHKTX (10.00). FFLEX return over 5 years is better than : 68.83 vs. RHKTX (50.57).
| FFLEX | RHKTX | FFLEX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.53 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.53 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.696 | 6.685 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.41B | 16.4B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 0.99 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 10.00 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 41.35 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.83 | 50.57 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers