Ad is loading...
FFOPX vs RBHEX
FFOPX vs RBHEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOPX vs. RBHEX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOPX is a Hold and RBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHEX has more cash in the bank: 33.8B vs. FFOPX (20.2B). FFOPX pays higher dividends than RBHEX: FFOPX (2.02) vs RBHEX (0.63). FFOPX was incepted earlier than RBHEX: FFOPX (10 years) vs RBHEX (11 years). RBHEX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFOPX (0.08). FFOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. RBHEX (5.00). RBHEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFOPX: RBHEX (250) vs FFOPX (5000000). FFOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. RBHEX (5.97). FFOPX return over 5 years is better than : 70.79 vs. RBHEX (43.53).
| FFOPX | RBHEX | FFOPX / RBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.17 | 7% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.17 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.308 | -1.675 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.2B | 33.8B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.63 | 322% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 5.97 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 15.46 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.79 | 43.53 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers