Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFOPX vs RBHEX
FFOPX vs RBHEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOPX vs. RBHEX commentary
May 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOPX is a Hold and RBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHEX has more cash in the bank: 35.4B vs. FFOPX (20.4B). FFOPX pays higher dividends than RBHEX: FFOPX (2.01) vs RBHEX (0.62). FFOPX was incepted earlier than RBHEX: FFOPX (10 years) vs RBHEX (11 years). RBHEX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFOPX (0.08). FFOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. RBHEX (5.00). RBHEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFOPX: RBHEX (250) vs FFOPX (5000000). FFOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.91 vs. RBHEX (7.69). FFOPX return over 5 years is better than : 72.30 vs. RBHEX (44.51).
| FFOPX | RBHEX | FFOPX / RBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.17 | 7% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.17 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.230 | 3.399 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.4B | 35.4B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 0.62 | 322% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 7.69 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.01 | 26.16 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.30 | 44.51 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers