Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFOPX vs RBHEX
FFOPX vs RBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOPX vs. RBHEX commentary
Aug 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOPX is a Hold and RBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHEX has more cash in the bank: 38.1B vs. FFOPX (22.8B). FFOPX pays higher dividends than RBHEX: FFOPX (1.85) vs RBHEX (0.56). FFOPX was incepted earlier than RBHEX: FFOPX (10 years) vs RBHEX (11 years). RBHEX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFOPX (0.08). FFOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RBHEX (5.00). RBHEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFOPX: RBHEX (250) vs FFOPX (5000000). FFOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.18 vs. RBHEX (11.89). FFOPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.60 vs. RBHEX (40.51).
| FFOPX | RBHEX | FFOPX / RBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.17 | 7% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.17 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.435 | 10.936 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8B | 38.1B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 0.56 | 329% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.18 | 11.89 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 33.23 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.60 | 40.51 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.65 | 74.24 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers