Ad is loading...
FFOPX vs RCITX
FFOPX vs RCITX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOPX vs. RCITX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOPX is a Hold and RCITX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCITX has more cash in the bank: 33.9B vs. FFOPX (20.8B). FFOPX pays higher dividends than RCITX: FFOPX (1.96) vs RCITX (0.70). FFOPX was incepted earlier than RCITX: FFOPX (10 years) vs RCITX (18 years). RCITX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFOPX (0.08). FFOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. RCITX (5.00). RCITX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFOPX: RCITX (250) vs FFOPX (5000000). FFOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. RCITX (4.66). FFOPX return over 5 years is better than : 89.88 vs. RCITX (61.97).
| FFOPX | RCITX | FFOPX / RCITX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.01 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.01 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.116 | -1.517 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.8B | 33.9B | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 0.70 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | 4.66 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.40 | 13.83 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.88 | 61.97 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers