Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRCX vs NFRFX
FFRCX vs NFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRCX vs. NFRFX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRCX is a Buy and NFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRCX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. NFRFX (1.6B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than FFRCX: NFRFX (8.14) vs FFRCX (6.73). FFRCX was incepted earlier than NFRFX: FFRCX (25 years) vs NFRFX (11 years). FFRCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than NFRFX (0.67). FFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NFRFX (24.00). FFRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: FFRCX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. FFRCX (5.89). NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.52 vs. FFRCX (32.50).
| FFRCX | NFRFX | FFRCX / NFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.67 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.67 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.036 | 3.616 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 1.6B | 950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.73 | 8.14 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 7.83 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.44 | 27.58 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.50 | 42.52 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.69 | 62.58 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement