Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRCX vs PAFRX
FFRCX vs PAFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRCX vs. PAFRX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRCX is a Buy and PAFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRCX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. PAFRX (4.33B). PAFRX pays higher dividends than FFRCX: PAFRX (7.17) vs FFRCX (6.73). FFRCX was incepted earlier than PAFRX: FFRCX (25 years) vs PAFRX (14 years). FFRCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than PAFRX (1.04). PAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFRCX (41.00). FFRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAFRX: FFRCX (0) vs PAFRX (2500). PAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. FFRCX (5.78). PAFRX return over 5 years is better than : 35.35 vs. FFRCX (31.76).
| FFRCX | PAFRX | FFRCX / PAFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.97 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.04 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.036 | 3.513 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 4.33B | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.73 | 7.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 7.24 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.90 | 26.94 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.76 | 35.35 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.22 | 57.16 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers