Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs FRSAX
FFRHX vs FRSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. FRSAX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and FRSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. FRSAX (400M). FFRHX pays higher dividends than FRSAX: FFRHX (8.13) vs FRSAX (6.97). FFRHX was incepted earlier than FRSAX: FFRHX (23 years) vs FRSAX (14 years). FRSAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FRSAX (6.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSAX: FFRHX (0) vs FRSAX (1500). FFRHX (5.47) and FRSAX (5.44) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.18 vs. FRSAX (26.68).
| FFRHX | FRSAX | FFRHX / FRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.99 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.828 | 0.196 | -422% |
| Front Load | N/A | 1% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 400M | 4,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 6.97 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 5.44 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.09 | 13.47 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.18 | 26.68 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.57 | 34.94 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...