Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs FRSAX
FFRHX vs FRSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. FRSAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and FRSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. FRSAX (401M). FFRHX pays higher dividends than FRSAX: FFRHX (8.12) vs FRSAX (6.90). FFRHX was incepted earlier than FRSAX: FFRHX (23 years) vs FRSAX (14 years). FRSAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FRSAX (6.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSAX: FFRHX (0) vs FRSAX (1500). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. FRSAX (5.47). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 42.96 vs. FRSAX (26.46).
| FFRHX | FRSAX | FFRHX / FRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.99 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.549 | 1.039 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 1% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 401M | 3,591% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.12 | 6.90 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 5.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.84 | 18.78 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.96 | 26.46 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.88 | 36.22 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers