Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs LARCX
FFRHX vs LARCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. LARCX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and LARCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. LARCX (4.64B). FFRHX pays higher dividends than LARCX: FFRHX (8.13) vs LARCX (7.31). FFRHX was incepted earlier than LARCX: FFRHX (23 years) vs LARCX (17 years). LARCX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). LARCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LARCX: FFRHX (0) vs LARCX (1500). LARCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRHX: LARCX (1500) vs FFRHX (500). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. LARCX (4.88). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.18 vs. LARCX (38.27).
| FFRHX | LARCX | FFRHX / LARCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.41 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.41 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.828 | -0.733 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1500 | 33% |
| Net Assets | 16B | 4.64B | 345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 7.31 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 4.88 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.09 | 18.03 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.18 | 38.27 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.57 | 38.20 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers