Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs LRRRX
FFRHX vs LRRRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. LRRRX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and LRRRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. LRRRX (4.68B). FFRHX pays higher dividends than LRRRX: FFRHX (7.97) vs LRRRX (7.50). FFRHX was incepted earlier than LRRRX: FFRHX (23 years) vs LRRRX (17 years). LRRRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). LRRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX (0) and LRRRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. LRRRX (5.90). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.46 vs. LRRRX (36.20).
| FFRHX | LRRRX | FFRHX / LRRRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.303 | 1.542 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 4.68B | 316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 7.50 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 5.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.12 | 24.59 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.46 | 36.20 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.52 | 46.38 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement