Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs LSFNX
FFRHX vs LSFNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. LSFNX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and LSFNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. LSFNX (634M). LSFNX pays higher dividends than FFRHX: LSFNX (8.88) vs FFRHX (8.12). FFRHX was incepted earlier than LSFNX: FFRHX (23 years) vs LSFNX (8 years). LSFNX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). LSFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSFNX: FFRHX (0) vs LSFNX (1000000). LSFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. FFRHX (5.73). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.84 vs. LSFNX (42.54).
| FFRHX | LSFNX | FFRHX / LSFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.69 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.78 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.219 | 0.697 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 634M | 2,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.12 | 8.88 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.73 | 6.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.22 | 20.14 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.84 | 42.54 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers