Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs MXFAX
FFRHX vs MXFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. MXFAX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and MXFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. MXFAX (1.55B). FFRHX pays higher dividends than MXFAX: FFRHX (7.78) vs MXFAX (7.24). FFRHX was incepted earlier than MXFAX: FFRHX (23 years) vs MXFAX (21 years). MXFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. MXFAX (26.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MXFAX: FFRHX (0) vs MXFAX (15000). MXFAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRHX: MXFAX (25000) vs FFRHX (500). FFRHX (6.24) and MXFAX (6.17) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.42 vs. MXFAX (33.09).
| FFRHX | MXFAX | FFRHX / MXFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.96 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.96 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.255 | 2.718 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 25000 | 2% |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 1.55B | 977% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.78 | 7.24 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 6.17 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.87 | 26.88 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.42 | 33.09 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.66 | 52.37 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement