Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs NFRFX
FFRHX vs NFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. NFRFX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and NFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. NFRFX (1.6B). NFRFX (8.14) and FFRHX (7.78) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than NFRFX: FFRHX (23 years) vs NFRFX (11 years). FFRHX (0.73) is less costly to investors than NFRFX (0.67). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NFRFX (24.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: FFRHX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. FFRHX (7.01). NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.00 vs. FFRHX (40.28).
| FFRHX | NFRFX | FFRHX / NFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.67 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.67 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.883 | 3.731 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 1.6B | 946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.78 | 8.14 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 7.71 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.51 | 28.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.28 | 43.00 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.82 | 62.28 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers