Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs PFSRX
FFRHX vs PFSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. PFSRX commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and PFSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. PFSRX (184M). FFRHX pays higher dividends than PFSRX: FFRHX (7.97) vs PFSRX (6.94). FFRHX was incepted earlier than PFSRX: FFRHX (23 years) vs PFSRX (17 years). PFSRX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). PFSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSRX: FFRHX (0) vs PFSRX (2500). FFRHX IRA initial investment is lower compared to PFSRX: FFRHX (500) vs PFSRX (100). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. PFSRX (5.18). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.30 vs. PFSRX (30.56).
| FFRHX | PFSRX | FFRHX / PFSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.68 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.81 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.414 | 1.295 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 100 | 500% |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 184M | 8,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 6.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 5.18 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 21.41 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.30 | 30.56 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.53 | 37.26 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers