Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs PSRZX
FFRHX vs PSRZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. PSRZX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and PSRZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. PSRZX (151M). FFRHX pays higher dividends than PSRZX: FFRHX (7.97) vs PSRZX (6.89). FFRHX was incepted earlier than PSRZX: FFRHX (23 years) vs PSRZX (14 years). PSRZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). PSRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSRZX: FFRHX (0) vs PSRZX (1000). PSRZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. FFRHX (6.26). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.30 vs. PSRZX (30.12).
| FFRHX | PSRZX | FFRHX / PSRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.303 | 2.132 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 151M | 9,801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 6.89 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 7.73 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.12 | 25.41 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.30 | 30.12 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.52 | 43.23 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers