Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs PSRZX
FFRHX vs PSRZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. PSRZX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and PSRZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. PSRZX (152M). FFRHX pays higher dividends than PSRZX: FFRHX (7.87) vs PSRZX (6.96). FFRHX was incepted earlier than PSRZX: FFRHX (23 years) vs PSRZX (14 years). PSRZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). PSRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSRZX: FFRHX (0) vs PSRZX (1000). PSRZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. FFRHX (7.11). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 41.42 vs. PSRZX (32.19).
| FFRHX | PSRZX | FFRHX / PSRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.366 | 3.349 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 152M | 9,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.87 | 6.96 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 8.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.17 | 30.80 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.42 | 32.19 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.53 | 44.84 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement