Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs PYFRX
FFRHX vs PYFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. PYFRX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and PYFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. PYFRX (140M). PYFRX pays higher dividends than FFRHX: PYFRX (8.28) vs FFRHX (7.78). FFRHX was incepted earlier than PYFRX: FFRHX (23 years) vs PYFRX (12 years). PYFRX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). PYFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYFRX: FFRHX (0) vs PYFRX (100000). PYFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. FFRHX (6.24). FFRHX (39.42) and PYFRX (39.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRHX | PYFRX | FFRHX / PYFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.71 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.95 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.255 | 3.566 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 140M | 10,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.78 | 8.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 7.13 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.87 | 29.89 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.42 | 39.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.66 | 59.19 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers