Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs RFRAX
FFRHX vs RFRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RFRAX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RFRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. RFRAX (727M). FFRHX (8.13) and RFRAX (7.75) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than RFRAX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RFRAX (19 years). RFRAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). RFRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRAX: FFRHX (0) vs RFRAX (2000). RFRAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRHX: RFRAX (5000) vs FFRHX (500). RFRAX (5.51) and FFRHX (5.47) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. RFRAX (39.64).
| FFRHX | RFRAX | FFRHX / RFRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.01 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.03 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.828 | -0.317 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 5000 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 16B | 727M | 2,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 7.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 5.51 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.03 | 17.94 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.55 | 39.64 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.04 | 46.99 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...