Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs RSFLX
FFRHX vs RSFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RSFLX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RSFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. RSFLX (400M). RSFLX pays higher dividends than FFRHX: RSFLX (9.66) vs FFRHX (7.97). FFRHX was incepted earlier than RSFLX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RSFLX (15 years). RSFLX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). RSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSFLX: FFRHX (0) vs RSFLX (2500). RSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.55 vs. FFRHX (6.60). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.25 vs. RSFLX (28.52).
| FFRHX | RSFLX | FFRHX / RSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.00 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.303 | 1.805 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 400M | 3,700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 9.66 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 7.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.80 | 20.88 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.25 | 28.52 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.85 | 48.44 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers