Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs SAMBX
FFRHX vs SAMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. SAMBX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and SAMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. SAMBX (1.34B). SAMBX pays higher dividends than FFRHX: SAMBX (9.45) vs FFRHX (8.13). FFRHX was incepted earlier than SAMBX: FFRHX (23 years) vs SAMBX (19 years). SAMBX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). SAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SAMBX: FFRHX (0) vs SAMBX (100000). SAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. FFRHX (5.47). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.18 vs. SAMBX (41.41).
| FFRHX | SAMBX | FFRHX / SAMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.64 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.78 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.828 | -0.953 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 1.34B | 1,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 9.45 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 6.24 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.09 | 19.75 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.18 | 41.41 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.57 | 49.49 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...